Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 194
 Finally I got a keeper from Casio November 14, 2007
Peter Sinclaire (Santiago, Chile)
104 out of 108 found this review helpful
This is the 3rd Casio I buy in the last year... and the cheapest. I previously tried the G601-1AV and later the GW1300A-9AV, both of the G-Shock family. However, I was looking for one with analog and digital time, but easy to read and with night illumination. The G601 is nice, but the small rounded digital displays are a bit too small for my old eyes, and the night illumination is only for the digital displays!. Then I bought the GW1300 because it was advertised as having two LEDs that illuminated the whole face of the watch and was solar powered. True! but... the design is such that when the face is illuminated in the dark, it is so full of shiny surfaces and reflections that you can hardly distinguish the analog hands, and nothing of the digital displays. So, I kept looking and finally decided on this one, the AQ160W with not too much hope... and voila! it was perfect for me! Thinner than the G-Shocks and very light weight, the digital displays are big and easy to read, even if the hands are over them (the digits look gold on day light, very nice, not like the picture here which shows how it looks when the green back light is on). The backlight, with optional auto turn-on, is perfectly readable, and you can see, besides the big numbers, the silhouette of the analog hands over the background. I am ready to give up the 200m water resist, the solar power, the waveceptor auto time set, the automatic handles setting by the digital clock, all for the good design of this watch. It would be perfect if Casio added to this one the solar power and the auto setting of the analog clock. The dual world time, auto calendar, chronometer, timer, multiple alarms, are all common features of these watches however.
The only drawback for me is the extremely thin resin band, which being very confortable, does not look long lasting. I hope I can find replacements in the future.
Anyway, great watch! My search is over...
(I must say that this search would have been much easier if I had the chance to try these watches in a local store before buying, but none of these models were available where I live.)
Update 26/Oct/2009: After 2 years of almost continuous use, the battery still works and the resin band, though not looking like new anymore, has no sign of deterioration. I was wrong thinking that it would break easily. Great watch!
Great looking watch... March 21, 2007
J. Lockard (Ann Arbor, MI)
57 out of 57 found this review helpful
With a timer, stopwatch, 4 alarms *and* a "snooze" alarm this would be a nice, full featured watch. But, add to that list multiple time-zones, daylight saving time switch *and* both analog and digital faces and you have a fantastic watch.
Likes: averaged size watch face, not HUGE, but not small, it looks good enough to be worn dressy or while roughing it. Multiple alarms is a necessity for me.
Dislikes: some functions only work in one direction. For example, if you are setting the analog face, the arms only move forward, so if you pass up the correct time, you need to go through another 12 hours of settings. Same thing for multiple time-zones, if you pass up the time-zone you want you'll need to circle the earth one more time. Not hugely a problem, just not convenient.
Nice Watch July 12, 2007
Barb (Portsmouth, Va United States)
35 out of 35 found this review helpful
I love the look of a digital/analog watch. Most of the ones I have seen are expensive, and mostly men's watches. This watch can be unisex, as it also has a wristband that will fit from a small wrist (mine are tiny) to a thick one. The directions for setting the many features were very clear and easy to understand. I love that it also has daylight saving time built in, so you don't have to worry about adjusting your watch. The analog, and the digital time change at once automatically. You can also set your watch according to city, and worldwide timezone. I could not have asked for anything more.
Really cool looking resin band Casio June 2, 2006
R. Hudda (USA)
11 out of 12 found this review helpful
Also check my review for AQ160WD1BV, the metallic version.
I own both. In terms of functionality and features, both the metal and resin band versions are exactly the same.
This resin band version looks little bit different, because of the black resin band, and a black ring above the dial as opposed to metallic ring. Given a choice i would choose the metallic version of this watch. But the resin band is very cool. Its lighter weight, the dial is slightly thinner.
This watch has world time, countdown timer, stopwatch, snooze alarm, everything you ever want, except
1) Solar power
2) Automatic time setting (waveceptor)
It also has the illuminator.
I would recommend this watch to anyone who is looking for a cool looking resin band casio.
One slight potential problem is, if you have a wide wrist, then this watch may not be for you. The resin band is not long enough for think wrists.
Great watch for sports, awesome functionalities November 30, 2007
Wu, Pin (FL, USA)
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
Light, well designed, all possible functions you can think of from a watch and great price! It's priced as a daily watch, nothing fancy. However the high-tech feel and actual impressive functions (world time, day time saving, countdown, stop watch, whole face lumination, digi-analog display, multi alarms with snooze, date and day display, and 100M waterproof). Someone complains about the material (easy to scratch...), but come on, for any other material this would not be as light as ideal for sports. If you are doing sports that require a timing device (such as running and swimming), you don't usually scratch it. If you are wrestling, you don't wear watch.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 194
|
